So, Apple is up to its old tricks again. It just hit HTC with yet another patent dispute on June 4, although the details only recently came to light. Apparently, Apple is claiming that HTC is still violating the patents that HTC says it’s now avoiding, although this time 29 devices are affected, including the HTC EVO 4G LTE, the One X, the One S, and the One V. If Apple succeeds, all of these devices will be delayed yet again (best case), or banned for sale in the US (worst case).
Meanwhile, have you heard about how Google and Motorola Mobility are trying to block Xbox 360 imports and other Microsoft products based on another patent dispute? Oh, and Apple is also trying to block imports of the new Samsung Galaxy SIII in the US.
There are a billion and one other patent disputes going on, as well, but these are receiving the most press.
So here’s a novel idea: instead of competing with each other in the courtroom, why not try competing through innovation? We all know that the GS3 will be sold in the US, come hell or high water. The Xbox 360 isn’t going anywhere, either. And neither are the EVO 4G LTE or the HTC One Series. All these patents accomplish in the end is footing each company involved with a multi-million dollar bill for court fees, lawyer fees, licensing fees, ITC fees, and other bogus costs. These, in turn, end up being passed on to consumers in the form of higher costs for devices.
Stop it, already. All of you. But especially you, Apple. The only thing you accomplished by delaying the launch of the EVO 4G LTE was ticking off a bunch of customers who have now added your products to their “list of things to never buy.” How, exactly, does that contribute to higher iPhone or iPad sales?
And Google: whatever happened to not being evil? How exactly is Xbox 360 – an in-home gaming system – a threat to Motorola Mobility, which makes smartphones?
All of these patent lawsuits are ultimately bad for consumers, bad for competition, and ineffective in the long run. To all consumers: if you’ve been thinking about grabbing an EVO or One Series device, you better do it now, before it’s too late. And to all the companies involved in these frivolous suits: let’s start getting serious again about making the best handsets we can, and let’s try to grow out these temper tantrums that happen every time you feel threatened by someone who – let’s face it – just made a better product than you did.



















well said!
The patent system isn’t in need of a huge overhaul, they just need to re evaluate how they approve software patents, which are often at the epicenter of these suits. They also need to enforce some sort of licensing scheme that encourages companies more to license instead of sure. Software patents are out of hand tho, at this point they’re pretty much patenting basic design concepts taught in second year programming classes. It’s like patenting calculus or differential equations…
It’s the American way. Let’s sue they shit out of them.
Or we can let one company innovate and have all other companies copy that.
Then where we be.
I love this article. It makes all the right points! Sorry apple that HTC made a better product than your iphone, how about you just make your next phone better ? It’s really not that tough…and the author makes a great point, I have added apple to my do not buy list.
How about this, that popped up today. Apple has been awarded a patent for the ‘wedge’ shape of their Mac Air. Last I checked, other laptops were already wedge shaped, so why is Apple allowed to patent this?
http://www.slashgear.com/apple-patents-the-macbook-air-wedge-shape-07232804/
I think that the Apple Goddess should sue Apple for using the Apple as it’s logo.
I believe that Apple, the Fruit, existed way before Apple the Svengali like Company.
Apple is in Violation of Nature, and should be held accountable, and be Punished to the Fullest Extent which the Law Allows.
All in Favor of Banishment from the World of Electronics say I………. I
The I’s have it.
Banishment is the Punishment of Choice.
Hasta La Vista.
And don’t let the door hit you on your ass on the way out.
Aholes!
I
Actually, your joke scenario already kinda happened… The Beatles estate sued Apple years ago over the use of the name since their own label was called Apple records or whether, they agreed to share the name as long as Apple refrained from using it in the entertainment market etc. Of course when Apple opened a freaking online music store that became an issue so they got sued again (in reality the iTunes store might be Job’s biggest positive legacy tho, getting studios to agree on pricing is one of the biggest feats of salesmanship ever). Anyway, it took a few more years for the dust to settle on that second round of lawsuits, which kept the Beatles off iTunes until the Abbey Road anniversary a few years ago. A couple of other product names that Apple has used lately were previously trademarked (including the iPhone), they usually get sued and then settle.
I have an little iPod
I curse it every day.
I never would have bought it
Knowing what I know today
That snobby-culture I-thing
Which children slaved to build
All to increase the profits
With no care who they kill
‘Tis Apfel who can eat dirt
For Android cleaned their clock
So bring in all the lawyers
When I-smarts you ain’t got.
The graves I dream to pee upon
they number but a few
It’s time to add another
And do the Job that’s due
May Stevie’s grass grows greener
May Apfel’s cash flow leaner
May Android play my music cleaner
And bladders be emptied again.
/m
Nice…very clever.
Pretty cool
I’d rather have a rusty fork jammed in my eye than own anything made by Apple.
You must have a glass eye then lol!
If you do, I of course am not laughing at that.
Well, you know what I mean
I can tell you one thing, I was considering an Apple TV, but now I will not any Apple products, PERIOD. I wrote off the IPhone, once Android came out and the IPad was never an option for me. No Apple Anything for Me. Apple is losing more than it’s gaining through those lawsuits, customers, markets share and money.
I wish this article had a ‘like’ button!
I put Apple on my “do not buy” list a long time ago. But I gotta say that I don’t necessarily agree with this article, either. What on Earth would be the point of patenting something if it didn’t mean anything other than somebody telling you “just make it better.” Then WTF was the point of my invention, patent, trademark, etc?
What I don’t agree with is patents being enforced because something loosely resembles the patent. That’s crap. And I don’t agree with companies that have no integrity going after every Tom, Dick, and Harry that has a product that loosely resembles their own. That’s petty and it’s lame. And I hope that the consumer community wakes up one day and says “you know, that really DOES kinda suck…” and they buy something else.
The consumers ultimately have the power, because we are the ones holding the money. Don’t buy it.
Maybe we should be more VOCAL about why we don’t buy Apple’s overpriced-but-otherwise-good products? I mean, I think their products are good, but I won’t buy them simply on my issues with their integrity.
Well I agree with you on the need for patents, but I think the problem is that these companies are allowed to patent just anything. Apple makes a computer that’s just a screen and suddenly that’s revolutionary? Apparently seeing as though Samsung’s Galaxy Tabs are too similar. I think patents should be restricted to true innovations, like…a space shuttle…or something like that. Not the shape “rectangle” for a computer. Things like slide to unlock and all that should never have been allowed to have been patented in the first place imho. I do quite a bit of DIY and I’ve actually made stuff that companies have later come up with and patented. Which doesn’t mean that I should have done it, it means that it’s too obvious of an innovation that you can give a single person/company the ownership of it.
Ha. You were just above me but you and and I are on pretty much the same page.
I completely agree. Cheers.
I don’t have a problem with Apple (or anyone) defending their patents. It’s when they defend patents that are so broad and generalized that they could mean anything.
When THOSE type of patents are defended and it causes product launches to be missed or delayed, that is just terrible. That is why the patent system needs just evaluate how they award patents for software and hardware.
They are insane. Notice how they only go after whatever phone is popular or about to be at the time. A few months ago it was the Gnex then the one X and evo lte and now the GS3. Notice a pattern?
I am convinced that most of this patent brouhaha is disguised marketing. And so if that is true then I am PISSED that our tax dollars are being used as fodder for extreme capitalists.
Love the toys tho.
I think mobile hardware has plateaued and differentiators will become fewer and fewer.
funny how we can write an article to help crank up the apple haters but yet have a section devoted to apple lovers on the same web site. Wow just like politicians, playing both sides of the fence. Good solid stand!
Just wondering, 3 of the ten items listed on the review page are for apple products, do you use them all?
I don’t have any Apple products, actually. This site has writers who focus on Windows products, Apple products, and Android – that’s what makes us different than a lot of the Android fan-sites. Still, at the same time, we offer an easier way to filter out only the news you want; that’s why we keep the G&E stuff separate and easily accessible.
funny, if you click on apple, your article is one of the items that comes up. Might want to tweak things a bit.
No, that’s intentional – this article is not only about Android; it’s also about Apple, after all…
still love ya, it’s a great web site