In a week, my Galaxy S II will be a year old. A year also happens to be the maximum legal duration of any contract here in Norway, so I’m looking at an unlocked phone and a lower monthly rate. Naturally I’ve been considering getting a new subsidized phone, upgrading my Galaxy S II to something newer, but there’s only one problem: The smartphone market bores me to death right now.
The Galaxy S II is closing in on being a two year old model, but that’s frankly hard to see. The only obviously outdated part of the thing is the screen resolution, which at 800 x 480 is what you now see in entry level phones, not flagship devices. On the other hand though, I’ll take an 800 x 480 AMOLED screen over a 720p LCD screen any day. The 1.2Ghz dual core Exynos chip still packs enough of a punch that you never consider it a slow device from normal use, even when running Gingerbread. It’s fully capable of playing back 1080p video through HDMI, handles both 32 and 64GB microSD cards (the latter not officially, but it still works), the 8 megapixel camera is still great, and its replaceable battery and availability of the official 2000mAh extended battery kit ironically makes the thing outperform most newer smartphones on battery life.
What’s more ironic is that compared to the Nexus 4, the Galaxy S II actually outclasses it in several other ways as well. I already mentioned battery life, and on top of that you can throw both USB OTG support and storage capacity. If there’s one thing I hate, it’s upgrades that aren’t really upgrades, but just alternative device configurations that leave it to subjective needs to decide what is more important. I can count on one hand how many times I’ve done anything on the S II in the last month that would benefit greatly from a higher screen resolution, while I use USB OTG so often that I keep an adapter with me in my bag, as well as a couple at home. I can’t take a device seriously when features are removed from older generations. The iPad 3/4 is another example, where the extra thickness, weight, charging time, and shorter battery life makes the benefits of the high resolution screen a bitter sweet experience.
Even the S III is to me less than interesting. There’s still no readily available black version, which I actually find to be an issue since I have some Tasker creations that rely on a black device with an AMOLED screen. Again it really comes down to screen resolution (/size) and performance, and those two aspects are really not that important to me, as I mostly use my phone as a sort of PDA. You don’t need a 720p screen to view a todo list and reply to an email. If the upgrade to the S III was completely free, I would take it, but the problem is that it isn’t. Even with subsidies and any money I get from selling the S II, upgrading to any flagship model is going to end up costing me about 2000 NOK, roughly $350. I simply don’t see that value anywhere in the market right now, and it seems like each new model is at best a $100 upgrade over the last as far as value goes.
It might sound like I’m complaining here, but I’m not really. I’m glad that there are fewer changes between generations now, and we’re seeing the same sort of behavior on other OSes as well. The difference between an iPhone 4S and an iPhone 5 aren’t that great, and if the camera and some other minor features aren’t important to you, even an iPhone 4 will give you most of the experience. It seems that pretty much across the board, the last couple of generations of devices are fairly interchangeable. It’s a nice change of pace, and I hope this trend continues for a while.



















…What Tasker creation is dependent on a black device?
Amoled screens display black by turning off pixels, meaning that part of the screen is literally off. Even good lcd screens have a visible distinction between the screen and the black frame, especiially in the dark. I have some custom notifications that use this amoled “phenomenon” to display notifications that appear as if graphics just appear on a complete black front. On top of that, my home screens, custom tasker apps (scenes) and so on are all based around how black looks on amoled. It’s not exactly a life and death feature, but neither is anything that the s iii has over the s ii, so it does become a factor. Imagine if a device you want is only available in a color you absolutely hate, like puke green or pink or whatever. It would affect your decision to buy one.
My problem here is that you support AMOLED. If you don’t care about color accuracy, sure, but it really bothers me when backgrounds are blue instead of the white they’re supposed to me.
That and the horrible plastic construction of Samsung phones have kept me away from the otherwise perfect S2/S3.
Motorola has the same issues, and unfortunately Google is trying to go cheap with its nexus line instead of making a truly attractive smartphone. Guess I’m stuck with HTC’s poor support but better hardware. At least I can fix that myself.
I actually quite like AMOLED’s color reproduction, even if it’s not realistic at times. As for whites appearing as blue, that’s no something I’ve ever thought of while using my S II. Keep in mind that the S II uses a much superior version of AMOLED to what Samsung has put in several of its devices in the last couple of years. Even if it was a problem though, having gray blacks would be a bigger pain than having blue whites.
I’m not looking to upgrade my smartphone for a very long time. Like you said, the iPhone 4S is still a truly amazing phone – and if I want to use the latest version of Android, my Galaxy Nexus does an absolutely outstanding job. The iPhone 5 and Nexus 4 – while great devices – simply don’t offer me anything that I would want out of a new smartphone. I’m in the same boat as you, Andreas: I’m not spending money on a new phone that I don’t want.
I am also not rushing to upgrade.
While the Note 2 looks like the perfect device to replace my Dell Streak, I am not in need, and I want to see more of what is coming out soon.
The Sony Experia Z, that ZTE 5″ Device, and other phablets are what I am interested in.
I am currently at a record, 28+ months on my DS5, But hungry for something…else?
Peace
I’ve said it before, but I enjoy your outlook (even if it can appear pessimistic on shallow observation) on gadgetry. I think seeing through the hype and constant sales pitch is what makes your tips/projects as useful as they are. And frankly it’s just a good counterpoint to the constant push for novelty and pointless iteration in the rest of the techosphere.
Thank you, I’m glad others share the same point of view! I have to agree that there can be a bit too much focus on new devices out there, which I find utterly peculiar considering that some of the things people complain about on their brand new devices (especially the Nexus series) are things that you could just avoid by looking beyond the 2012 lineup of phones. I can’t understand how people accept having to charge a device twice in a day in a device that is supposed to be a flagship device.
I guess what I am afraid of is that my mobile experience won’t change, specifically improve.
My Browser takes too long to start the progress bar. Several seconds. Then the progress bar just hangs. And hangs. Gets almost done, hangs some more, then loads the page, sometimes taking several more moments to complete the progress bar. It is excruciating when I am just trying to read a few pages while on break at work. I clear the cache, and history, Toggle airplane mode. It all seems to help, but takes up my time.
I had the same experience when I was using WinMo and IE. Just mobile data, not so much of a problem on WiFi.
Have the radios improved over the last 2 years?
Does Android execute the browser better in the latest versions?
Do other long time smart phone users see an improvement in current devices regarding mobile data?
I understand all about Edge, 3G, 4G etc…That is not my question.
Has mobile useability been improved upon in the last 2 years?
Peace