|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
|
UPDATE: Comparison chart of all configurations here: http://www.pocketables.net/2009/03/b...-p-models.html (updated 06/09 with 2.0GHz scores)
1.3GHz, 64GB SSD: ![]() 1.6GHz, 128GB SSD (thanks, rennteam): ![]() Anyone with the 1.8GHz and/or HDD variants care to run CrystalMark 2004R3 and share their scores? |
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
Do we have a non SSD score?
|
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
|
Nope, not yet. That's why I'm asking for it in the first post. It would be great if we could get the scores from all models here.
FYI: The custom GPU drivers for XP discussion that was forming here has been moved to its own thread: http://forum.pocketables.net/showthread.php?t=2050 |
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
|
|
#5
|
||||
|
||||
|
Great! Thanks, myvaiop.
Now all we need are the 1.8GHz scores and maybe some different SSD combinations. Do we know for sure if the 64GB and 128GB SSDs are the same speed, etc.? |
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
|
Crystalmark score from my P (specs see sig)
|
|
#7
|
||||
|
||||
|
Thanks, myvaiop! It looks like aside from capacity, the SSDs are just about the same.
|
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
|
My 1.86GHz, 128GB SSD is finally being shipped from Dynamism after weeks of waiting. I noticed that someone requested that a CrystalMark benchmark be run on such a device and posted. I didn't see that this was ever done so I would be glad to do it. I plan to put Windows 7 on my P, but I suppose I should run the benchmarks first on Vista and then on Windows 7 and see if there's any difference. I don't expect there should be any difference, but I'm not sure.
|
|
#9
|
||||
|
||||
|
Yes, hortym, please run CrystalMark on Vista first. Thank you! Looking forward to seeing the results.
|
|
#10
|
|||
|
|||
|
Finally got my Vaio P from Dynamism. Heres what I got...
1.86GHz, 128 GB SSD
|
|
#11
|
||||
|
||||
|
Great! Thanks, np0531.
|
|
#12
|
|||
|
|||
|
I just got the Sony P in White this past Monday and have installed Windows 7. I ran the CrystalMarks and this is what I got.
|
|
#13
|
|||
|
|||
|
Figured I'd post the benchmark for my 2.0Ghz P91 here as well to keep everything in one place.
P91HS 2.0Ghz 64 GB SSD
__________________
Viliv S5 (HK Version) UMID M1-321EWE UMID M1-434KWA Sony Vaio P91HS Sony Vaio P90S Sony Vaio UX390N Sony Vaio UX180P |
|
#14
|
|||
|
|||
|
The stock score of my P19WN (1.3ghz Z520, 2GB, 60GB HDD):
![]() Seems the cpu and memory scores are slightly higher then the other z520 models I see in this thread? I did optimize the vista install, remove most unwanted programs and services to reduce the system load. Same device with FSB set tot 166 with SetFSB to get a cpu speed of 1.66Ghz: ![]() Because of the higher FSB the memory scores higher then all the default setups with a 133mhz fsb. The videocard gets a slight bump in speed because of this also but you probably wont notice it (only in the benchmarks, not in real life) When I get my 32gb Mtron SSD I will post again to compare the scores! |
|
#15
|
|||
|
|||
|
Firt of all thank you for all comments they helped me to replace my HDD with the runcore SSD. Unfortunatly i did not see the conics video but i tink i done it also well.
In my opinion the Sony Vaio P11Z with the 1,33Ghz Atom an the 64GB Runcore SSD in combine with Windows 7 and the new Intel GMA 500 Drivers is a wonderfull machine. I tested it with Crystalmark (Version from the forum) And it seemd to be as fast as the 1,86Ghz or nearly the 2Ghz Version. Sony Vaio P11Z/Q 1,33GHz, 2GB, Runcore 64GB SSD Zif, Win7 ![]() I love the new Disk Speed :-) For everyone who has one of the HDD Versions of the Vaio P shold be tniking about to change it for the runcore SSD. After the switch the Vaio P becomes a realy nice Netbook. Here some boot Datas if you are interested in: Boot Windows 7 = 1min (1min 30sek with all background applications running) Start Explorer = 1 sek Start Firefox (first time) = 3,5 sek. Start Firefox (2. time) = 2,5 sek. Start IE 7 = 6 sek Start Word 2007 = 4 sek. Shut Down Win 7 = 9 sek. I am very happy now with my "new" vaio :-) Arthur |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|